By Benedictus de Spinoza
Edited by J E Bradburn
AXIOM 1: All bodies are either in motion or at rest. (By body I mean modes (a way, manner, or form, e.g. a way of doing something, or the form in which something exists).
AXIOM 2: Every body is moved sometimes more slowly, sometimes more quickly.
LEMMA 1: Bodies are distinguished from one another in respect of motion and rest, quickness and slowness, and not in respect of substance.
His Proof—The first part of this proposition is, I take self-evident, that bodies are not distinguished in respect of substance, is plain both from 1.5. and 1. 8. It is brought out still more clearly from 1, 15. Note.
LEMMA 2. All bodies agree in certain respects.
His Proof: All bodies agree in the fact, that they involve the conception of one and the same Attribute (II, Definition i). Further, in the fact that they may be moved less or more quickly, and may be absolutely in motion or at rest.
LEMMA 3. A body in motion or at rest must be determined to motion or rest by another body, which other body has been determined to motion or rest by a third body, and the third again by a fourth, and so on to infinity.
His Proof; Bodies are individual things (II, Def 1), which (Lemma 1) are distinguished one from the other in respect to motion and rest; thus (I. 28) each must necessarily be determined to motion or rest by another individual thing, namely (II. 6), by another body, which other body is (Ax. 1) in motion or at rest. And this body again can only have been set in motion or caused to rest by being determined by a third body to motion or rest. This third body again by fourth, and so on into infinity Q.E.D.
Corollary.—hence it follows, that a body in motion keeps in motion, until it is determined to a state of rest by some other body; and a body at rest remains so, until it is determined to a state of motion by some other body. This is indeed self-evident. For when I suppose, for instance, that a given body, A, is at rest, and do not take into consideration other bodies in motion, I cannot affirm anything concerning the body A, except that it is at rest. If it afterwards comes to pass that A is in motion, this cannot have resulted from its having been at rest, for no other consequence could have been involved than its remaining at rest. If, on the other hand, A be given in motion, we shall, so long as we only consider A, be unable to affirm anything concerning it, except that it is in motion. If A, is subsequently found to be at rest, this rest cannot be the result of A’s previous motion, for such motion can only have led to continued motion; the state of rest therefore must have resulted from something, which was not in A, namely from an external cause determining A to a state of rest.
Genesis 2:2 (KJV) “And on the seventh day God ended His work which he had made; and He rested on the seventh day from all His work which He had made.”
Exodus 20:8-11 (KJV)
08 “Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy.”
09 “Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work:”
10 “But the seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates:”
11 “For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day, and hallowed it.”
Axiom 1—All modes, wherein one body is affected by another body, follow simultaneously from the nature of the body affected and the body affecting; so that one and the same body may be moved indifferent modes, according to the difference in the nature of the bodies moving it https://levendwater.org/companion/append4.html; on the other hand, different bodies may be moved in different modes by one and the same body.
Axiom 2—When a body in motion impinges (to affect the limits of something, especially a right or law, often causing some kind of restriction) on another body at rest, which it is unable to move, it recoils (to experience a change in momentum as a result of a nuclear collision or the emission of an elementary particle, in order to continue its motion), and the angle made by the line of motion in the recoil and the plane of the body at rest, wherein the moving body has impinged, will be equal to the angle formed by the line of motion of incidence (the frequency with which something occurs) and the same plane.
So far we have been speaking only of the simplest bodies, which are only distinguished one from the other by motion and rest, quickness and slowness (The planets). http://www.godsplan.org.uk/booksofenoch.htm
We now pass on to compound bodies (something made by combining two or more things).
Definition—When any given bodies of the same or different magnitude are compelled by other bodies to remain in contact, or if they be moved at the same or different rates of speed, so that their mutual movements should preserve amongst themselves a certain fixed relation, we say that such bodies are in union (planets), and that together they compose one body or individual [God], which is distinguished from other bodies by the fact of this union. (All planets rotate anti-clockwise around the sun at the same distance; why? http://www.godsplan.org.uk/godcontrols.htm
1. Just imagine if planets collided with each other, there would be chaos.
2. The other reason is to put in place the Precession of the Equinoxes; http://www.godsplan.org.uk/jehovah%27sword.htm to tell the elite when God’s system is immanent. http://www.godsplan.org.uk/Orion.htm http://www.godsplan.org.uk/riddleofthesphinx.htm By Adham, son, and Enoch grandson.
AXIOM 3—In proportion as the parts of an individual, or a compound body (to add together, or add one thing to another, to form a whole) http://www.godsplan.org.uk/internalspirit.htm, are in contact over a greater or less superficies, they will with greater or less difficulty admit of being moved from their position; (from someone who got mixed up) to; consequently the individual will, with greater or less difficulty, be brought to assume another form. http://www.godsplan.org.uk/jehovah%27skingdom.htm
1. Those bodies, whose parts are in contact over large superficies, are called hard;
2. Those whose parts are in contact over small superficies, are called soft;
3. Those, whose parts are in motion among one another , are called fluid.
LEMMA 4 If from a body or individual, compounded of several bodies, certain bodies be separated, and if, at the same time, an equal number of other bodies of the same nature take their place, the individual will preserve its nature as before, without any change in its actuality (forma).
His Proof—Bodies (LEMMA 1) are not distinguished in respect of substance: that which constitutes (to be, amount to, or have the status of a particular thing) the actuality (formam, former) of an individual consists (by the last Definition) in a union of bodies; but this union, although there is a continual change of bodies, will (by our hypothesis)be maintained; the individual, therefore, will retain its nature as before, both in respect of substance (physical reality that can be touched and felt) and in respect of mode (a way, manner, or form, e.g. a way of doing something, or the form in which something exists) Q.E.D.
LEMMA 5 If the parts composing an individual become greater or less, but in such proportion, that they all preserve the same mutual relations of motion and rest, the individual will still preserve its original nature, and its actuality will not be changed. Proof—The same as for the last Lemma.
LEMMA 6 If certain bodies composing an individual be compelled to change the motion, which they have in one direction, for motion in another direction, but in such manner, that they may be able to continue their motions and their mutual communications in the same relations as before, the individual will retain its own nature without any change of its actuality.
His Proof—This proposition is self-evident, for the individual is supposed to retain all that, which, in its definition, we spoke of as its actual being.
LEMMA 7 Furthermore, the individual thus composed preserves its nature, whether it be, as a whole, in motion or at rest, whether it be moved in this or that direction; so long as each part retains its motion, and preserves its communication with other parts as before.
His Proof—This proposition is evident from the definition of an individual prefixed to Lemma 4.
Note—We thus see, how a composite individual may be affected in many different ways, and preserve its nature notwithstanding. Thus far we have conceived an individual as composed of bodies only distinguished one from the other in respect of motion and rest, speed and slowness; that is, of bodies of the most simple character. If, however, we now conceive another individual composed of several individuals of diverse natures (made up of many differing parts), we shall find that the number of ways in which it can be affected, without losing its nature, will be greatly multiplied. Each of its parts would consist of several bodies, and therefore (by Lemma 6) each part would admit, without change to its nature, of quicker or slower motion, and would consequently be able to transmit its motions more quickly or more slowly to the remaining parts. If we further conceive a third kind of individuals composed of individuals of this second kind, we shall find that they may be affected in a still greater number of ways without changing their actuality. We may easily proceed thus to infinity, and conceive the whole of nature as one individual, whose parts, that is, all bodies, vary in infinite ways, without any change in the individual as a whole. I should feel bound explain and demonstrate this point at more length, if I were writing a special treatise on body (a formal written work that deals with a subject systematically and usually extensively). But I have already said that such is not my object; I have touched on the question, because it enables me to prove easily that which I have in view.
POSTULATES (to assume or suggest that something is true or exists, especially as the basis of an argument or theory).
1. The human body is composed of a number of individual parts, of diverse nature, each one of which is in itself extremely complex (difficult to analyse, understand, or solve).
2. Of the individual parts composing the human body some ae fluid, some soft, some hard.
3. The individual parts composing the human body and consequently the human body itself are affected in a variety of ways by external bodies (situated on, happening on, or coming from the outside).
4. The human body stands in need for its preservation of a number of other bodies, by which it is continually, so to speak regenerated (form again, or become formed again).
5. When the fluid part of the human body is determined by an external body to impinge (to affect the limits of something, especially a right or law, often causing some kind of restriction) often on another soft part, it changes the surface of the latter, and, as it were, leaves the impression thereupon of the external body which impels it (to force somebody to do something, or make somebody feel the need to do something).
6. The human body can move external bodies, and arrange them in a variety of ways.
PROPOSITION 14: The human mind is capable of perceiving a great number of things (to notice something, especially something that escapes the notice of others), and is so in proportion (a quantity of something that is part of the whole amount or number) as its body is capable of receiving a great number of impressions.
His Proof: The human body (by postulate 3and 6) is affected in very many ways by external bodies, and is capable in very many ways of affecting external bodies. But (II 12) the human mind must perceive all that takes place in the human body; the human mind is therefore, capable of perceiving a great number of things, and is so in proportion, &c. Q.E.D (a quantity of something that is part of the whole amount or number).
PROPORTION 15: The idea, which constitutes the actual being (to be, amount to, or have the status of a particular thing) of the human mind, is not simple, but compounded (something made by combining two or more things) of a great number of ideas [GOD].
His Proof—The idea constituting the actual being of the human mind is the idea of the body, which is composed of a great number of complex individual parts. But there is necessarily in God the idea of each individual part whereof the body is composed http://www.godsplan.org.uk/internalspirit.htm; therefore, the idea of the human body is composed of these numerous ideas of its component parts Q.E.D.
PROPOSITION 16: The idea of every mode (a way, manner, or form, e.g. a way of doing something, or the form in which something exists), in which the human body is
Affected (acted upon or influenced by somebody or something) by external bodies http://www.godsplan.org.uk/persecution.htm must involve the nature of the human body, and also the nature of the external body.
His Proof—All the modes, in which any given body is affected, follow from the nature of the body affected, and also from the nature of the affecting body (by Axiom 1, after the Corollary of Lemma 3), wherefore their idea also necessarily involves the nature of both bodies; therefore, the idea of every mode, in which the human body is affected by external bodies, involves the nature of the human body an of the external body Q.E.D.
1. Corollary 1—Hence it follows, first, that the human mind perceives the nature of a variety of bodies, together with the nature of its own.
2. Corollary 2—It follows, secondly, that the ideas, which we have of external bodies, indicate rather the constitution of our own body than the nature of external bodies. I have amply illustrated this in the Appendix to Part 1. (Simply stated, we picture a body in a dream instead of the external body) http://www.godsplan.org.uk/internalspirit.htm)
PROPOSITION 17 If the human body [spirit] is affected (acted upon or influenced by somebody or something) in a manner which involves the nature of any [external body], the human mind will regard the said external body as actually existing, or as present to itself, until the human body be affected in such a way, as to exclude the existence or the presence of the said external body.
His Proof—This Proposition is self-evident, for so long as the human body continues to be thus affected, so long will the human mind (2. 12) regard this modification of the body—that is (by the last Prop), it will have the idea of the mode as actually existing, and this idea involves the nature of the external body. In other words, it will have idea which does not exclude, but postulates (to demand or claim something) the existence or presence of the nature of the external body; therefore the mind (by 2.16. Corollary 1) will regard the external body as actually existing, until it is affected, &c, Q.E.D.
Corollary—The mind is able to regard as present external bodies, by which the human body has once been affected, even though they be no longer in existence or present.
His Proof—When external bodies determine the fluid parts of the human body, so that they often impinge on the softer parts, they change the surface of the last named (Postulate 5); hence (Axiom 2, after the Corollary. of Lemma 3) they are refracted (to alter the appearance of something by viewing or showing it through a different medium) http://www.godsplan.org.uk/doctrineofdemons.htm therefrom in a different manner from that which they followed before such change; and, further, when afterwards they impinge (interfere) on the new surfaces by their own spontaneous movement (resulting from internal or natural processes, with no apparent external influence), they will be refracted in the same manner, as though they had been impelled towards those surfaces by external bodies; consequently, they will, while they continue to be thus refracted, affect the human body in the same manner, whereof the mind (2. 12) will again take cognizance (knowledge or awareness of something)—that is (2. 17), the mind will again regard the external body as present, and will do so, as often as the fluid parts of the human body impinge on aforesaid surfaces by their own spontaneous notion. Wherefore, although the external bodies, by which the human body has once been affected, be no longer in existence, the mind will nevertheless regard them as present, as often as this action of the body is repeated Q.E.D.
Note—We thus see how it comes about, as is often the case, that we regard as present many things which are not. It is possible that the same result may be brought about by other causes; but I think it suffices for me here to have indicated one possible explanation, just as well as if I had pointed out the true cause. Indeed, I do not think I am very far from the truth, for all my assumptions are based on postulates (to assume or suggest that something is true or exists, especially as the basis of an argument or theory), which rest, almost without exception, on experience, that cannot be controverted (to argue strongly against something) by those who have shown, as we have, that the human body, as we feel it, exists (Corollary, after 2. 13). Furthermore, we clearly understand what the difference is between the idea, say, of Peter, which constitutes the essence of Peter’s mind, and the idea of the said Peter, which is in another man, say, Paul. The former directly answers to the essence of Peter’s own body, and only implies existence so long as Peter exists; the latter indicates rather the disposition of Paul’s body than the nature of Peter, and therefore, while this disposition of Paul’s body lasts, Paul’s mind will regard Peter as present to itself, even though he no longer exists. Further, to retain the usual phraseology (the phrases used in a particular sphere of activity), the modifications of the human body, of which the ideas represent external bodies as present to us, we will call the images of things, though they do not recall the figure of things. When the mind regards bodies in this fashion, we say that it imagines. I will here draw attention to the fact, in order to indicate where error lies, that the imaginations of the mind, looked at in themselves, do not contain error. The mind does not err in the mere fact of imaging, but only insofar as it is regarded as being without the idea, which excludes the existence of such things as it imagines being present to it. If the mind, while imaging non-existent things as present to it, is at the same time conscious that they do not really exist, this power of imagination must be set down to the efficacy of its nature (the ability to produce the desired result), and not to a fault, especially if this faculty of imagination (a mental power or ability such as reason or memory) must be set down to the efficacy of its nature, and not to a fault, especially if this faculty of imagination depend solely on its own nature—that (1 Definition 7), if this faculty of imagination be free.
PROPOSITION 20 The idea or knowledge of the human mind is also in God, following in God in the same manner, and being referred to God in the same manner, As the idea or knowledge of the human body.
His Proof—Thought is an attribute of God (II. 1); therefore (II. 3) there must necessarily be in God the idea both of thought itself and of all its modifications, consequently also of the human mind (II. 6). Further, the idea of knowledge of the mind does not follow from God, insofar as He is infinite, but in so far as He is affected by another idea of an individual thing (II. 9). But (II. 7.) the order and connection of ideas is the same as the order and connection of causes (a person or thing [God] that makes something happen or exist or is responsible for something that happens); therefore this idea or knowledge of the mind is in God and is referred to God, in the same manner as the idea or knowledge of the body. Q. E. D.
PROPOSITION 21 This idea of the mind is united to the mind in the same way as the mind is united to the body.
His Proof—That the mind is united to the body we have shown from the fact, that the body is the object of the mind (II. xii. and xiii); and so for the same reason the idea of the mind must be united with its object, that is, with the mind in the same manner as the mind is united to the body. Q. E. D.
Note—This proposition is comprehended much more clearly from what we have said in the note to II. Vii. We there showed that the idea of body and body, that is, mind and body (II, xiii), are one and the same individual conceived now under the attribute of thought, now under the attribute of extension (to think of something as caused by a particular circumstance); wherefore the idea of the mind and the mind itself are one and the same thing, which is conceived under one and the same attribute, namely thought. The idea of the mind, I repeat, and the mind itself are in God by the same necessity and follow from Him from the same power of thinking.
Fact: When you pray, God hears what you mean, and if the prayer is compatible to Him; and not for selfish reasons, He will answer your prayer http://www.godsplan.org.uk/internalspirit.htm.
Strictly speaking, the idea of the mind, that is, the idea of an idea, is nothing but the distinctive quality (forma) of the idea in so far as it is conceived as a mode of thought without reference to the object; if a man knows anything he, by that very fact, knows that he knows it, and at the same time knows that he knows that he knows it, and so on to infinity.
PROPOSITION 22 The human mind perceives not only the modifications (a slight change or alteration made to improve something or make it more suitable) of the body, but also the ideas of such modifications.
His Proof—The ideas of the ideas of modifications follow in God in the same manner, and are referred to God in the same manner, as the ideas of said modifications. This is proved in the same way as II. xx. But the ideas of the modifications of the body are in the human mind (II. xii), that is, in God, in so far as He constitutes the essence of the human mind; therefore the ideas of these ideas will be in God, in so far as He has the knowledge or idea of the human mind, that is (II. xxi), they will be in the human mind itself, which therefore perceives not only the modifications of the body, but also the ideas of such modifications. Q. E. D.
PROPOSITION 23 The mind does not know itself, except insofar as it perceives the ideas of the modifications of the body.
His Proof—The idea or knowledge of the mind follows in God in the same manner, and is referred to God in the same manner, as the idea or knowledge of the body. But since the human mind does not know the human body itself, that is, since the knowledge of the human body is not referred to God, in so far as He constitutes the nature of the human mind; (to create and establish something formally, especially an official body); therefore, neither is the knowledge of the mind referred to God, insofar as He constitutes the essence of the human mind; therefore, the human mind thus far has no knowledge of itself. Further the ideas of the modifications, whereby the body is affected, involve the nature of the human body itself, they agree with the nature of the mind; wherefore the knowledge of these ideas necessarily involves knowledge of the mind; but (by Prop 22) the knowledge of these ideas is in the human mind itself; wherefore the human mind thus far only has knowledge of itself.
This is as far as I go with this one; however, I will introduce to you what is in everyone’s mind at the moment and they are COVID 20 and lockdowns.
Things you ought to know and understand
Ancient – Medieval – Modern (Biblical Prophecy)
Revelation 13 (KJV)
01 “And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy.”
02 “And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority.” http://www.godsplan.org.uk/system.htm
03 “And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast.”
04 “And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him?”
05 “And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies; and power was given unto him to continue forty and two months.”
06 “And he opened his mouth in blasphemy against God, to blaspheme His name, and His tabernacle, and them that dwell in heaven.”
07 “And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations.” http://www.godsplan.org.uk/state.htm
08 “And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.”
09 “If any man have an ear, let him hear.” http://www.godsplan.org.uk/earstohear.htm
10 “He that leadeth into captivity shall go into captivity: he that killeth with the sword must be killed with the sword. Here is the patience and the faith of the saints.” http://www.godsplan.org.uk/christianrace.htm
11 “And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon.”
12 “And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed.”
13 “And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men,”
14 “And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live.” http://www.godsplan.org.uk/persecution.htm
15 “And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.” http://www.godsplan.org.uk/apostasytogodskingdom.htm
16 “And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:” http://www.godsplan.org.uk/faith.htm
17 “And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.” http://www.godsplan.org.uk/markofcain.htm
18 “Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.” http://www.godsplan.org.uk/
666 = Rev 13: (Denotes rebellion, apostasy, defection, disintegration, and revolution,) verse 18. Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast; for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six. It is very important to know and understand that the Anti-Christ 666 will arrive on earth prior to Christ our Lord.
1. Revelation 6:12: - Sixth Seal. 6 (Denotes the human number) 12 Denotes Government perfection, which have to do with government in the heavens and the earth.
2. Revelation 9:13 - Sixth Trumpet. 6 9 - (Denotes Finality of Judgment). 13 Denotes rebellion, apostasy, defection, disintegration, revolution.
3. Revelation 16:12 - Sixth Vial. 6 (10+ 6 = 16) (10 Denotes ordinal perfection. 6. Denotes the human number). 12. Denotes Government perfection, which has to do with government in the heavens and the earth. (Goliath, Nebuchadnezzar, and Antichrist) are all emphatically marked by this number. Old Testament events serving as "ensamples" for the latter day events, how does this historical blueprint fit for our future? Instead of flesh pagan kings coming upon Jerusalem to siege and physically destroy, the latter day king of Babylon will be Satan and his angels as thorns and briers treading upon Jerusalem to do a spiritual destruction. According to Revelation 12:6 (note the numbers) forward, Satan and his angels will be booted out of Heaven down to this earth for the future tribulation; and that latter day working by the king of Babylon will be one of great deception. That is the type of devastation upon Jerusalem for the latter days.
COVID PANDEMIC: [Mass Inoculations].
Mass inoculations have been announced by the Government; and administered by the N.H.S. Over Twenty million people in the United Kingdom alone have been ear-marked to fall into line, by frightening people to accept it. The only way this can be achieved has already taken place:
1. Apostasy: meaning, unbelief of God. http://www.godsplan.org.uk/lastend.htm
2. Persecution by those who do not believe. http://www.godsplan.org.uk/persecution.htm
3. The Tares; who are they? http://www.godsplan.org.uk/parables.htm
Matthew 24 (KJV)
01 “And Jesus went out, and departed from the temple: and his disciples came to him for to shew him the buildings of the temple.”
02 “And Jesus said unto them, ‘See ye not all these things? Verily I say unto you, there shall not be left here one stone upon another, not that shall be thrown down.” http://www.godsplan.org.uk/olivetdiscourse.htm
03 “And as He sat upon the mount of Olives, the disciples came unto Him privately, saying, Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign of Thy coming, and of the end of the world?”
04 “And Jesus answered and said unto them, ‘Take heed that no man deceive you.” http://www.godsplan.org.uk/doctrineofdemons.htm
05 “For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many.”
06 “And ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars: see that ye be not troubled: for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet.”
07 “For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places.” http://www.godsplan.org.uk/armageddon.htm
08 “All these are the beginning of sorrows.”
09 “Then shall they deliver you up to be afflicted, and shall kill you: and ye shall be hated of all nations for My name's sake.”
10 “And then shall many be offended, and shall betray one another, and shall hate one another.”
11 “And many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many.”
12 “And because iniquity shall abound, the love of many shall wax cold.” http://www.godsplan.org.uk/apostasytogodskingdom.htm
13 “But he that shall endure unto the end, the same shall be saved.”
14 “And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the end come.” http://www.godsplan.org.uk/thetwowitnesses.htm
15 “When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand).”
16 “Then let them which be in Judaea flee into the mountains:”
17 “Let him which is on the housetop not come down to take anything out of his house:”
18 “Neither let him which is in the field return back to take his clothes.”
19 “And woe unto them that are with child, and to them that give suck in those days!”
20 “But pray ye that your flight be not in the winter, neither on the Sabbath day:”
21 “For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be.” http://www.godsplan.org.uk/stormcoming.htm
22 “And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect's sake those days shall be shortened.”
23 “Then if any man shall say unto you, ‘Lo, here is Christ, or there; believe it not.’”
24 “For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.”
25 “Behold, I have told you before.”
26 “Wherefore if they shall say unto you, Behold, He is in the desert; go not forth: behold, He is in the secret chambers; believe it not.”
27 “For as the lightning cometh out of the east, and shineth even unto the west; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.”
28 “For wheresoever the carcase is, there will the eagles be gathered together.”
29 “Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken:” http://godsplan.org.uk/greattribulation2.htm
30 “And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.” http://www.godsplan.org.uk/thesufferingsandglory.htm
31 “And He [Jehovah] shall send His angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together His elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.” http://www.godsplan.org.uk/elect.htm
32 “Now learn a parable of the fig tree; When his branch is yet tender, and putteth forth leaves, ye know that summer is nigh:”
33 “So likewise ye, when ye shall see all these things, know that it is near, even at the doors.”
34 “Verily I say unto you, ‘This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled.’” Today’s generation.
35 “Heaven and earth shall pass away, but My words shall not pass away.”
36 “But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but My Father [Jehovah] only.”
37 “But as the days of Noah were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.”
38 “For as in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark,”
39 “And knew not until the flood came, and took them all away; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.” http://www.godsplan.org.uk/secondadvent.htm
40 “Then shall two be in the field; the one shall be taken, and the other left.”
41 “Two women shall be grinding at the mill; the one shall be taken, and the other left.”
42 “Watch therefore: for ye know not what hour your Lord doth come.”
43 “But know this, that if the good-man of the house had known in what watch the thief would come, he would have watched, and would not have suffered his house to be broken up.”
44 “Therefore be ye also ready: for in such an hour as ye think not the Son of man cometh.”
45 “Who then is a faithful and wise servant, whom his lord hath made ruler over his household, to give them meat in due season?”
46 “Blessed is that servant, whom his lord when he cometh shall find so doing.”
47 “Verily I say unto you, ‘That he shall make him ruler over all his goods.’”
48 “But and if that evil servant shall say in his heart, My lord delayeth his coming;”
49 “And shall begin to smite his fellow servants, and to eat and drink with the drunken;”
50 “The lord of that servant shall come in a day when he looketh not for him, and in an hour that he is not aware of,”
51 “And shall cut him asunder, and appoint him his portion with the hypocrites: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.”
The term quarantine or (lock down) comes from medieval times to fight the black-death pandemic which was then caused by fleas of the black rat rodent https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Death. The new vaccine (which is made from rodents) is being rushed through; and is thought to be a ruse (a clever trick or plot used to deceive others) by many people with only the pharmaceuticals and governments profiting through this exercise how else could they pay individuals to isolate, and lockdown. According to London Real; run by Brian Rose is a no-nonsense look for people who do not know what is happening.
LOCKDOWN 2.0 IN BRITAIN WAS A MISTAKE - DATA IS BEING MISREPRESENTED.
There will be music for about half a minute, then down to the nitty gritty, press arrows at extreme right hand, bottom corner; for full screen view.
The Covid20 Pandemic is being set to distribute a vaccine by the Tory Government and pharmaceutical corporations to inoculate millions of unsuspecting people for which the Government are paid £15.00 per head; and stand to make big profits by it, as well as the pharmaceutical corporations. They both are scaremongering people to have the inoculation; which invade the body’s immune system thereby causing cancer and life threatening illnesses.
This vaccine has never been tested on humans and has been conceived by scientists (To think up something such as a plan or an invention that could be put into action0. Families will never forgive themselves.